dwcraig1

Just my opinion/thoughts. So you take a 900 mah 3s lipo and re-wire it parallel, now it's a 2700 mah lipo. Sounds good, right? Well it's still just 10 watt hours. Given those numbers I see no advantage to building a DNA75 using a lipo, I would just spend a few bucks more and use the 200 board. I do see a market for the 75 with interchangeable 18650/26650 though as most folks vape at way less than 75 watts. Again just my way of looking at it.

I have yet to even own a 26650, currently have no plans to either. I would guess that the CDR can be set with EScribe on the 75 like it can be on the 200. Do I have this right?

They need to be checked with an ohm meter, it that how you checked them? I guess a volt meter could be used as well, should read pack voltage between #3 and ground with batteries installed but the ohm meter would be best.

This may be a long shot but check both of these little "chips" that are being used to bridge the ground pin to battery negative and #3 pin to battery positive. If they are open bridge them with solder and/or wire. There's one on each side.

Is the battery draining while just sitting (off charger) ?

Me too.....LOL

That 1300 mah Turnigy is the same one that I put in my Vapecige, I had to add a "T" plug on mine. https://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/store/uh_viewItem.asp?idProduct=59112 A bunch cheaper here but shipping is not included and a bit steep, still cheaper though. I would use the FullyMax replacement if it were me.

Lost Vapes DNA 200, if not the mini, comes with a 1300 mah FullyMax battery. This should provide the vaping time of roughly one and a half 18650's. There doesn't appear to be enough room for a larger battery. [video]https://youtu.be/kBHJ36OKNXg?t=220[/video] @ 3:10 when he opens it.

I think it will be the same, just use the 21.4 wh and 2.9 volts cut off.....IMO

Keep in mind that your not running them down to 2.5 volts, the calculator is a bit more accurate with a Li-polymer as the cut off is higher when rated for Mah 21 -22 sounds about right. While you may have set the cut off to 2.5 volts I don't think it will go to that.

It sure looks "rigged". It's so impossible to meet the requirements that maybe something can be done.

[video]https://youtu.be/QNAFyiNYGMw[/video]

I can only guess at the answer to that, I would imagine there would be a slight change but small. What I see posted as recommended is to run the battery analyzer using the wattage that you mostly vape at.

This post my be of some interest to you with regards to cell cut off: /topic/65604-topic/?do=findComment&comment=886729

In the bottom right had corner of Device Monitor it will list your version, 2016-2-23 is the newest recommended.

I'll only go with the 200 FW when it's "suggested" to try it next time.

I've been "busy", can I take a break now?

Well except I used EScribe 1.0.56 to roll it back to the 02/23 FW. This came from Evolv's DNA75 page.

So here is what I just did. I flashed my DX200 with the "pulled" software (4/25 FW) then I uninstalled that EScribe and installed the one on the DNA75 page of Elolv's site and flashed it back to 2/23. All went smoothly.

It sounds like all versions that have the materials tab should be able to do a roll back then....perhaps.

I rolled 3 of mine back within a couple of hours but I used the 2016-02-29 EScribe to do it. mikepetro did you do yours with the beta EScribe?

Over on the "big forum" it goes like this "you can attack the post but don't attack the poster. I think that can work here too.

Try using an earlier version of EScribe, one listed as testing or recommended. I reverted 3 of mine back to earlier FW from 4-25

From what I gather only the newer firmware that's included is only for the DNA75. I tried to flash one of my 200's with the 75's firmware and it couldn't see the device. (EScribe version 1.0.56)