Jump to content

dwcraig1

Moderators
  • Posts

    2,450
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    171

Everything posted by dwcraig1

  1. I'm going to do one using a flask clone later this year I think using the small screen one.
  2. Among a few other things it will make SS3XX work smoothly.
  3. /topic/66731-topic/?do=findComment&comment=900119 The one listed as "Early" 2016-08-08.....just listed
  4. Should it only work on a Vapor Shark?I thought I'd give it a try (on my VT133) here is snip: Should it only work on a Vapor Shark?
  5. Mine, Vtbox200, and some others had a bit of e liquid between the JST connector that's on the board and the board doing some minor conducting causing cell 3 to drain slowly if sitting a few days.
  6. ^^^^true but still might how the ).0016? came to be.
  7. I'm surprised this wasn't mentioned before so here goes. I just checked my SDNA 75 again for mod resistance, not only was I wanting to see than it was still 0.002? but wanted to see how many digits the the right of the decimal point it reads and it's 3. So how did DJSLB come up with ).0016?? Just something I was thinking about, perhaps he measured it with other means.
  8. The way I see it there are only a few reasons that would make it "necessary" to upgrade to this latest software/firmware, you have a DNA250 or DNA60, SS3XX is your go to wire. I upgraded all of mine regardless, my go to wire is SS430 Ni free, it worked good with the recommended firmware. Just saying.
  9. Much better and consistent with what others are reporting.
  10. I would try a reboot first, Steve explains reverting the firmware pretty well here: http://vapingunderground.com/threads/hcigar-vt133-dual-18650-dna200.171476/page-74#post-1307253
  11. This one? http://www.protovapor.com/product/evolv-510-connector/
  12. I'm guessing the 60 will be in a different case, just a guess though.
  13. I'm not sure how many 250's are available but there's one less black one now.
  14. ^^^^well put....to the point
  15. Here is material tab open and with SS316 highlighted, note the graph's 800 F figure. Here is with the appellate open ready to change it. Note it is 0.006 and the line on the graph has moved to reflect this setting. No changes are made till OK is pressed and uploaded to the device. So unless you are naming your CSV's 0.006, ect. I don't understand how you see this value anywhere but in the window to change it. As far as the mod kicking out of TC, well I never got to that part.
  16. Where on EScribe/mod are you seeing this 0.006 figure?
  17. As far as I know only the accuracy of the "displayed" battery value will be effected, the charge will be determined by the cell voltage. Note the amperage of charge as they get to 4.2 volts (or 4.1 - maximum recharges )
  18. You can view your charging figures with Escribe in device monitor, the charger built onto the board does a good job of not overcharging the cells over 4.2 volts. I'd say the percentage is not accurate, probably the curve is not quite right as your watt hours are about right.
  19. Maybe you are using an earlier version of EScribe without the materials tab?
  20. What happens when you choose a material rather than setting a TCR?
  21. Here's a couple snips of from material's tab, the first shows the set TCR for ss316, the second snip shows the appellate to change the setting. Until you click OK the setting doesn't change so .006 (Ni, the default) will always be the number in the box the first session using EScribe. Note the number at the 800 degree mark without the little window open. Does that number change by itself? (between EScribe sessions)
  22. The mod should have the settings that were uploaded to it.....or if you made any changes on the mod after EScribe.... these settings on the mod is what a re- connected EScribe should be showing.
×
×
  • Create New...