znapr

Can you shine a light behind the pod so we can see if they've changed the internal design of the airflow?

In regards to the MTL pod. Is it Lost Vape who is making it? Any changes to the design? Because increasing the ohms doesn't make it MTL. The 0.25 could work as a MTL if they changed the internal design of the pod.

I'd love to see them in something like a Billet Box in a smaller version or even make a 3D printed one myself if they're going to be sold to the public.

Also the Orion is made and sold by Lost Vape. Evolv manufactures the chip but is not responsible for what cable Lost Vape ships with it.

Interesting and I definitely would like to try it. If you're after flavour, you can't beat MTL though and should definitely try it out with a suitable RTA/RDA.

It can't come soon enough! Since the one of the reasoning behind developing Replay was consistent flavour, has Evolv considered investigating changes in Power delivery dependant on PG/VG ratio? They have very different boiling points and therefore the ratio has a direct effect in how the vaporised juice tastes. Obviously this is very more nuanced, needs a lot of testing in many respects and would probably be more suited to more advanced users. However, I think it is something worth investigating in the future.

That's just Lost Vape jumping the gun or just preemptively putting it in their manual; that's their problem.

If it's hidden there must be a reason especially so early on in the release of the feature. Completely agree on the second point. DNA devices have by far the best TC but it never caught on because of 2 main issues: bad 510 connections and sketchy atomiser design that results in unstable resistance. I've been complaining for ages and have written to various people such as pbusardo to convince them to stress the importance of these 2 factors in the reliability of TC but nothing has come out of it. I haven't tried the Evolv 510 but I'm using the Source 510 in all of my 3D printed mods, which is derived from Evolvs design. It is by far the most reliable spring-loaded 510 I have ever used and results in excellent TC. The most reliable is obviously the old 510 non adjustable (or non spring loaded) 510s from my GG mods. I understand the convenience of a spring loaded connection but has just led to massive inconsistency issues because of flawed and cheap designs and is the main contributing factor to almost noone using TC. Sorry of the rant but I'm quite passionate about this topic and looking back maybe I could have done more but we we're here now.

Relax everyone. Evolv never sold DNA75C with Replay as a feature. We're getting it as an added benefit. It will be ready when it's ready. If they were worried about it affecting 250C sales they wouldn't have announced the availability of the feature on the 75C preemptively. Having said that, I cant wait to try it and I certainly don't plan on ever buying a large device like the 250C to try it. Also, while Apple isn't perfect, just contemplate on the fact that iPhones go at least 4-5 of continuous updates, while most of the Android devices out there are still running the stock Android version they were sold with after 4-5 years.

Gingervape is obviously British, judging from the name and thus the use of an 's' instead of a 'z'.

TC is a game changer imho for any type of vaping it just wasn't implemented correctly. Replay seems to work better, especially since it seems to be more forgiving and works more reliably; it's going to be pretty big.

Yeah Nick is great and Evolv support is generally pretty awesome. A sign of a very healthy company.

Can we get Replay for the 75C now

Definitely a problem with the 510 (or in some cases the atomiser) which gives an unstable reading. If you run atomiser analyser you'll see the resistance moving all over the place without you powering the mod. Poor 510 connections is a major issue, even in big manufacturers and it is the biggest contributor to people not using TC as it makes it highly unreliable. The problem is manufacturers never bothered to make good 510 connections and everyone just blamed the inconsistency on the technology.

I'm waiting impatiently to try this. The 75C and 250C have very similar firmware. I believe once the 250C is out there and hasn't got any major issues we will see a 75C version. Would love a beta version to try out asap

Yes the feature isn't out yet. But you can just download the International Version of Escribe.

Does it matter? Just download the International version. This replay feature sounds very intriguing. I can sort of guess what they're doing but very curious to try it out. Sucks that my boards USB isn't working and I can't update it

Here's my 3D printed DNA75C. It needs more finer sanding and in the next version I will make the secondary buttons larger. However, it feels rock solid in the hand and more importantly very comfortable!

I'm trying to load one of my custom themes to the DNA75C but I'm getting EEPROM failed. It only happens with my modified theme of the default Evolv one. Any suggestions?

The new version fixes it James. Thank you very much!

Same problem here.

I've speed read through most answers but according to pbusardo, Evolv told him that the DNA75C, contrary to previous boards, does not have refinement.

Installed and working fast and reliably on 10.13. UI obviously looks a big out of place on a Mac but who cares about this right now. (When I get the time some time during the summer I might create some mockups of how you make this feel more at home)

Did you even read his entire post? People are in such a rush nowadays.... James thank's for all the good work, never thought this day would come. Will be submitting bug reports

Thank you very much sir!