Margucci

Wow. Thanks a ton.

i am very well aware. however, if you want to be notified when there is a new early release there is only one way. to subscribe to the thread. however, when you subscribe you are notified constantly whenever anyone post anything. most of the replies in that thread do not belong in there. something more organized would be beneficial. ie: - pin a thread (locked) which only has posts with the new firmware, changelog, as well as a link to a bug report topic. - for each firmware release create a bug thread. in this thread anyone who has any issues with escribe or firmware version X posts their issues there. by doing this people are posting their issues in a area which is specific to their needs. also, this makes it easier for evolv to see the issues they need to look into. and as for my point, the people who just want to be notified when there are new releases just subscribe to the first topic. its a win-win-win situation.

it seems that 99% of the posts in the early firmware thread are people looking for tech support. i personally subscribe to that thread so i know when there new versions of the prerelease firmware available. however, constantly being spammed by irrelevant posts has grown tiresome. can a new thread be created, pinned, and locked so that those of us who are just looking for the firmware releases dont have to sift through posts which would be better placed elsewhere to find the info we are looking for.

I want to be able to fire superconductors. Clouds bro. Clouds.

the protection is the same. pretty much all companies use nearly identical antivirus definitions. the real benefit is because of OS integration. your system will use less resources and scan the files quicker in real-time use with windows defender rather than any 3rd party application.

Yea 24A at 11.1V is insane.

That didn't change. You need to press +/- twice quickly while locked though.

If you are just looking for that feature you can get the previous release from a few months ago. It was included in that update.

yup, keep in mind that these packs arent running at 3.7v. they are running at (approx) three times that. this is why the reuleaux with 3x18650 will power the device like a 3s lipo will. its only once the board steps down the voltage to something you would vape at that the current to the 510 runs higher. ---- edit ---- i came in third

so far everything is working great. thanks for the update.

no idea. i dont trust any of the configuration dont by volcano. they just had the defaults for months. just make sure that your case resistance is set to 0.007 and then run the battery and case analyzer. use the results you get. they will be the best.

same. i just have it show me to temp.

It doesn't matter what their intended use is. A large section of consumers have gone in a different direction. No one camp is right or wrong. However, both need to be viable for a successful product.

just to repeat for people too lazy to read... WE WANT IT AS AN OPTION! YOU CAN CHOOSE WHICH IS SHOWN

And the battery gets hotter and doesn't have as high of a current limit. They are just sub par batteries.

I think it would be best to just fill a fog machine with ejuice and aim it towards our mouthes.

thats going to be a problem. how will i be able to build below 0.01ohm. its all about the clouds, bro.

Yea just do step up voltage to get up to those 800w levels. I like my vapes hot. The hotter the better even if I need to sacrifice soft tissue.

there are some 220w devices starting to creep into the market. personally im looking for a 800W device run by a car battery.

there better not be. the board is fine. if they would make the changes people have been requesting it would be even better.

in the same size space, not that i have seen. there is someone who made a 3d printed spacer which would give you extra space in the battery compartment and you can put a larger battery in.

TCR and CSV files are the exact same thing within a given range. if your CSV file has only two points, room temperature and 600*F the result would be identical as a TCR value. however, usually in a CSV file it is separated into temperature ranges. so you have one TCR from room temp-300*, 300-350, 350-400, 400-450, 450-500, 500-550, and 550-600. if the change in resistance varies with temperature than this will give you the best overall result. if the TCR stays constant across temperature than it wont make a difference. materials like SS dont vary much at all. however, as is easily seen in steam engine this isnt the case with nickel. in the case of nickel the TCR is determined at what someone at some point decided was the "ideal temperature" and looked at the TCR between room temperature and that point. therefore at that specific temperature the TCR will be very accurate. however, the more you stray from that temperate the more inaccurate the temperature will be. keep in mind that this is with the proper values. because without that neither would be accurate .

the thing which people dont take into account is the starting resistance. if you build your SS coils with high initial resistance they are more than accurate enough. i find that an initial resistance in the 0.4-0.5 ohm range gives great results.

another feature which i will +1. hopefully it will get some attention eventually.

yea i dont think anyone is upset that it hasnt happened yet. we are disappointed at the lack of communication. there is a huge chunk of this forum who have asked for this feature. there are many others who have posted elsewhere who have wanted this feature. something as small as "this will be released in a future update" would be all we need for the time being.