Johan

"Temperature (degF)","Electrical Resistivity" -58,0.915064 -0,0.95433 68,1 121,1.15 302,1.2 390,1.25 490,1.30 590,1.35 800,1.40 lordmage, or anybody - I wanted to try these numbers but having trouble hitting the exact number with the mouse. Can't figure out how to input with the keyboard. Also, how do you set electrical resistivity points. Managed to "split" one to add another, is that the only way? I have been loading one of Jaquiths .csv's and trying to tweak it, but I'm curious as to how to start from scratch. And yes, it does appear that I know just enough to probably get myself in trouble lol. Thanks edit - I got them as close as I could and tried it with 316L on a Cthulhu V1 and it actually worked. Was happy, then it just quit temp control. Grrr....

If you're still interested, these guys have it. http://www.zivipf.com/epages/63862298.sf/en_GB/?ObjectPath=/Shops/63862298/Products/NiFe48-0.40/SubProducts/NF48-0.40-10m

Issues are encountered with 316l (UD) and 317l (Unkamen) of various gauges. Have tried SteamEngines .csv's, DJaquiths custom .csv's, and just a TCR. Using an Hcigar VT200, the mod is not just jumping out of TC, it does not sense this as TC wire at all. 430 SS works with no issues. There is a lot of discussion on this in the General Discussion forum under various "Stainless Steel" titles by a bunch of folks who are a lot more knowledgeable than me, that I would recommend reading to get a better understanding of the problems. I made some stainless core clapton (coaxial) wire (24g 316l/30g Ni200) that the VT200 wont read either, but works fine in a RX200 or Evic Mini. Perhaps it is just a problem with my particular board. p.s. Please do not edit my posts, if you don't like them just delete...

Earth to Evolve, Earth to Evolve...board failure on stainless steel temp control. I repeat.... I'm assuming you guys read this forum, but I have not seen any replies to all the SS issues that many users are having. Don't think ss is going away anytime soon, and your competitors have it figured out. Some help would be appreciated. TIA

If you just have/want to use nickel wire, this stuff is a lot easier to work with. https://www.lightningvapes.com/products/tempered-ni200-pure-nickel-wire?variant=5718186437

Yeah, I just tried the 317l from Unkamen using the .csv from Steam Engine and the DNA 200 is just not reading it as TC wire. Oh well, I have other mods that do. Kind of odd though that it will read the 430 SS. On a side note, got some Ti from Unkamen and it works good with Jaquiths Titan wire .csv. Inexpensive, but dirty.

There are two or three threads here that have a lot of good info about stainless steel. Here is one; /topic/66385-topic/

Just got some 28g 430 and it is working well. My board just will not read 316l in TC. Using the 430 .csv from Steam Engine. On device monitor I can see a lot of temp corrections, but they are tight and not fluctuating wildly. Nice clean vape. Unkamen sent a 317l sample, will give that a try next. Ti is still my wire of choice but this is pretty good.

My DNA200 will not read SS 316l as a TC wire. I've tried UD wire in 28, 26, and 24g in 4 different attys. Tried Dalquiths .csv's, Steamengines, and just TCR. Have some 317l and 430 on the way. What really gives me a sad face is the RX200 and Evic Mini both see this wire as TC, and work quite nicely with it.

I'm not so sure. He also has the battery at 13.54 wh. And the rest of those numbers are vastly different than what I got, and what others have posted. Got a Koopor Plus a while back and it was a total failure on stainless steel temp control. Got a replacement and it was the same. Dry or wet the cotton just burst into flame. Got a refund (shout out to VaporTek USA for that). Then I watched the djlsb review on that mod, and he edited out the dry burn test for stainless steel. I emailed him asking about that twice but got no reply. And I have noticed other times where he has minimized or ignored issues with other hardware. He is generally a good reviewer, has contributed much to the vaping community, and I have learned a lot from him. But there is no way I would just "trust" him.

Temperature (degF)Electrical Resistivity -580.65 681 2121.16 3021.56 3921.66 4821.81 5721.987 8002.665 Never used Excel so this is all I can seem to get. Yes, kind of pathetic lol. Jaquith, could you give us a hand here. It appears that the file dropper file has expired. Thanks

Work may have been put into that, but for me the SweetSpot .csv for the .4mm wire was a failure on dry burn test. I picked up a .csv that had been posted by Jaquith that works good for that wire. Tried to find it again here but no luck. I still have the file on my computer, but am too ignorant of file sharing apps to know where to post it.

I would be leery of using numbers from a guy who came up with .022 for a mod resistance.... You can get the latest Escribe update right here on this site; /topic/66731-topic/

I'm getting between .004 - .006 depending on how far the plug is screwed in and it switches between those readings until it bottoms. When it's bottomed out it reads "?", which is what I first saw as I was looking at the plug as it was twisted in. Had me scratching head for a minute. So I guess this example has a mod resistance range, but .004 comes up the most so I'll try that...

I'm using your mod resistance number and appears to run fine, but did order the tool from Bob since it's best to check each individual mod. Lol, actually I'm just a tool junkie...thanks again.

Very cool, thank you. Hey, how do you like that new tool? Now that you have used it, can you recommend it?

I ran case analyzer with no atomizer and no sleeve. Now I'm wondering which way is correct. Just looked at that Facebook page, they are showing the new VT133 dual battery mod coming soon. Ah crap....

Thank you for that info. Look forward to your results on mod resistance. I have been using .0045, which I found posted a couple of times, but I'm too inept to figure it out for myself. The 3 mods I currently have, and a cheap ohms meter all read my builds differently. Have a Coilmaster 521 tab on the way, so soon I will have 5 different readings lol.

As stated above, everyone should run the case analyzer for their particular device. I'll list my results here for comparative purposes. I had been using the numbers posted at djlsb's website, and those are far different than my results. They both worked. I don't have the tools to test the TC accuracy, so can't say if one is better than the other. Cooling time constant 827.60 Heating time constant 554.30 USB charge temp rise 7.38 F/A 15.65 In regards to which 510 you have, I have wondered the same thing. The connector on mine looks like gold, is shiny, and has a silver colored center pin. A magnet will not stick to it. I'm guessing it's the gold plated stainless, but not having a brass example to compare it to, am not positive. Serial number on this one is 8382 in case anyone knows where in the production run they switched over.

Escribe Ver. 1.0.35.2 will now accept 0.00092 instead of rounding to 0.0010 for the stainless steel 316l TCR.

This is what DJLsb posted on his site for Hcigar VT200 case thermals; Mod resistance 0.022 287.72 301.48 9.26 10.52 -20 110 As you can see they are quite different from those posted above. Every set of numbers I have seen is different. Tried running the utility myself and finally had to bail after 3 or 4 hours, going to give it another try when I have more time. I'm running those numbers there now, and it works. Optimally?..hell if I know.

Thanks for the reply and csv. I agree that Sweet Spot should be more specific about their wire. Stating that their wire will form no iron oxide is contradictory at best if they are producing a Ti/Iron alloy. Why they would see fit to post a csv for the .4mm wire that doesn't work is quite confusing and certainly not beneficial toward establishing credibility for themselves and their products.

Mr. Jaquith, as I have a good amount of Sweet Spot Ti (.4mm) on the way, was disappointed to read of your bad experience with their .csv. Have you tweaked their curve or created one of your own? This material and .csv was recommended by a fellow who goes by the moniker of PBusardo (a newbie I think lol), and now I'm wondering if he did a dry burn test or is just happy with the practical application (ie: using it). Also I would like to thank you for the SS .csv's, using ver. 3 & 4 with good success, and for your general willingness to share your findings. Perhaps you might consider giving Mr. Busardo some competition on the Youtube circuit ;-)