Wayneo Posted July 29, 2017 Report Share Posted July 29, 2017 @Fabian9988 I applaud all your efforts, and if you will validate your VS is actually .007, then your Rebel value would also be correct. @Lowbytes No offense my good man, I was merely saying you could run with this ......... you know the old "Too many cooks can spoil the broth" saying, or something like that. We're all here to learn and assist each other. Here's the post I promised, and notice he used a straight 75. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian9988 Posted July 29, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2017 51 minutes ago, Wayneo said: @Fabian9988 I applaud all your efforts, and if you will validate your VS is actually .007, then your Rebel value would also be correct. @Lowbytes No offense my good man, I was merely saying you could run with this ......... you know the old "Too many cooks can spoil the broth" saying, or something like that. We're all here to learn and assist each other. Here's the post I promised, and notice he used a straight 75. Yea hopefully once I get the 510 copper short I will be able to see that the VS and the Rebel are. Cause right now they are 0.03ohms off. Which seems like a fairly big gap when all we're talking about for internal resistance is 0.001's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian9988 Posted July 29, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2017 (edited) 3 hours ago, Lowbytes said: So - one more try - i´ll take a look into your problem - can you please upload your ecig file of both mods - maybe we can discover whats up............ Ok so I changed the Rebel back to 0 and figured out how to save the ecig files. So I will upload them here. Let me know what you think thanks! Everything is back to how I got them new except the brightness and fade setting stuff. VSDNA250.ecig RebelDNA167.ecig Edited July 30, 2017 by Fabian9988 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayneo Posted July 30, 2017 Report Share Posted July 30, 2017 4 hours ago, Wayneo said: AA has not worked for me with the copper shorting tool since Feb 2016 on any 2xx series board, first going down to .006 followed by a ?. Now with the latest escribe v1.2 sp5.2, it goes down to .005 IIRC, without ever a ? 4 hours ago, Fabian9988 said: when the copper 510 tool gets here see what it comes up with Please let us know the results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian9988 Posted July 30, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 30, 2017 2 hours ago, Wayneo said: Please let us know the results. Oh so the copper 510 short does not work anymore? Should I cancel the order? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lowbytes Posted July 30, 2017 Report Share Posted July 30, 2017 vor 6 Stunden schrieb Wayneo: @Fabian9988 I applaud all your efforts, and if you will validate your VS is actually .007, then your Rebel value would also be correct. @Lowbytes No offense my good man, I was merely saying you could run with this ......... you know the old "Too many cooks can spoil the broth" saying, or something like that. We're all here to learn and assist each other. Here's the post I promised, and notice he used a straight 75. By the way - best way to practice my bad english - 40 Years ago finished school ...... hopefully the gramma is not too bad ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian9988 Posted July 30, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 30, 2017 When I'm in atomizer analyzer should the raw ohms be going up and down by 0.001 with the atty on all the way? It does not constantly move, it will stay on a reading for a bit but sometimes jumps 0.001 then goes back to the number it seems to stay on most of the time. It looks like the mod resistance is actually 0.003 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayneo Posted July 30, 2017 Report Share Posted July 30, 2017 @Fabian9988 Yes, that liitle jump is Evolv's doing. Glad you got it sorted. @Lowbytes Other than the odd spelling error in your last post, I would never have guessed that you weren't fluid in English 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
giz_60 Posted July 30, 2017 Report Share Posted July 30, 2017 A very slight variance is normal. .003 sounds a lot better than .019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian9988 Posted July 30, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 30, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, giz_60 said: A very slight variance is normal. .003 sounds a lot better than .019 Yeah I did a known resistance build of 0.7 and with the 0.003 the Rebel is right where it needs to be. Edited July 30, 2017 by Fabian9988 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeWB3 Posted July 30, 2017 Report Share Posted July 30, 2017 (edited) The DNA75c is reading ohms quite differently than in previous versions. It's also reading them differently using different versions of the firmware. In comparing results to that generated by a well calibrated Hobo X Al, I had four 75c mods that WERE reading them significantly lower. I would have needed a negative mod resistance offset to actually calibrate the mods and that's not possible. The most recent early release firmware (SP5) is suddenly reading them quite a bit higher and using the same Hobo X comparison I'm now needing to use a mod resistance offset of around 0.008. The four mods are vaping quite a bit better now. There ARE some other issues with the new firmware, but for me it's been an improvement. Edited July 30, 2017 by LeeWB3 Corrected to state the new firmware reads HIGHER. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian9988 Posted July 30, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 30, 2017 9 minutes ago, LeeWB3 said: The DNA75c is reading ohms quite differently than in previous versions. It's also reading them differently using different versions of the firmware. In comparing results to that generated by a well calibrated Hobo X Al, I had four 75c mods that WERE reading them significantly lower. I would have needed a negative mod resistance offset to actually calibrate the mods and that's not possible. The most recent early release firmware (SP5) is suddenly reading them quite a bit lower and using the same Hobo X comparison I'm now needing to use a mod resistance offset of around 0.008. The four mods are vaping quite a bit better now. There ARE some other issues with the new firmware, but for me it's been an improvement. Wow. Do they still sell Hobo X AI mods? I've herd a few times about that mod being as close to perfect as you can get in terms of the resistance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeWB3 Posted July 30, 2017 Report Share Posted July 30, 2017 (edited) 1 minute ago, Fabian9988 said: Wow. Do they still sell Hobo X AI mods? I've herd a few times about that mod being as close to perfect as you can get in terms of the resistance No, they are not sold anymore. I bought 2 secondhand, one of which had almost never been used. I have verified calibration using several means and believe i am VERY close so I can use it as my standard to compare other mods to. Edited July 30, 2017 by LeeWB3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian9988 Posted July 30, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 30, 2017 1 hour ago, LeeWB3 said: No, they are not sold anymore. I bought 2 secondhand, one of which had almost never been used. I have verified calibration using several means and believe i am VERY close so I can use it as my standard to compare other mods to. Nice I'll have t look around on the FB groups and see if any used ones pop up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now