Jump to content

Buellbloke

Members
  • Posts

    37
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Buellbloke

  1. Total waste of time posting but so funny, yes all three lipos could and would fail together. They are all one Mod with lipos behaving the same as each other. Standing (storage or how they come new) voltage for lipos is 3.8 volts, this needs to be checked regular, too high or too low and they will deplete, too low and they will die. Below 2.9 I believe will kill them. DNA 200 likes to be used, charged, used, charged, used, charged, they do not like to be left ignored. I know as have done exactly the same and they die. If your going to stop using them, disharge to 3.8 and check weekly. Do not just throw them away as any voltage left on them can turn them into a small bomb. Make sure you recycle them (give to hobby shop) or throw them in a bucket of salt water and leave them for a very long time. Proper lipo chargers can safetly disharge them fully. Then they can be thrown away safetly.
  2. The batteries getting old was an after thought concerning the VT75 Nano though I realise I tagged it onto the end of the the DNA200 bit. So to clarify the Vt75 nano since the update reads as charged, then drops a couple percent off the first vape, climbs back up then drops off again. Am losing 20 - 40% of my batteries since the update, prior it ran from 100% down to about 12%. The Vaporshark runs a Lipo 3S 9volt, the first battery killed off a cell after about 8 months of use, the new battery an exact replacement, seems to jump from 80% to 100% on the charge and never charges above 4.12, all other ( non lipo) batteries seem to charge to 4.20. Then the battery on first use will promptly drop to about 78%. I own the vaporshark Dna40 and rDna40 I find the vape in TC with nickel more satisfying on those devices than I do on the Vaporshark Dna200 in TC, it seems to take an age to hit the right wattage if ever and always throttles back much quicker, regardless of the pre heat setting. This is the Shark dna200 firing using a non TC 0.50 ohm stainless dual coil, Cell soft cutoff is 3.05volts This a 3 second puff on the Nano same coil as above. Cell soft cutoff is 2.75volts.
  3. I downloaded it the other day when the mod arrived, went on to implement my custom screens, change the screen on time, increase the wattage increments to 0.50, escribe prompted an update, did think at the time the Shark DNA200 was a buggy update and could have probs with the nano. then again I replaced the battery on the shark 200 with like so maybe the board forgot some settings? It's quirky the nano I just ignore it now, when the battery is flat or bugging out with 30% life I swap it out. Am running 0.50ohm coils so not like am taxing the thing. The device is pristine am even using Noalox on the threads to keep it smooth and maintain a good earth. Never been a fan of anything temp controlled above my rDNA40, always felt the vape on the DNA200 in TC with nickel was lack lustre. My batteries could be getting old I suppose, LG's two brown two yellows originally used as matched pairs in a Vaporshark DNA40 flask. They're all over a year old.
  4. Thought that was the software version of escribe.
  5. Dunno where would I find that out? DNA 75 DNA200
  6. Is it me or just my devices, updated my Vaporshark DNA200 last but one update, started having trouble with charging, would jump from 80% to 100% then as soon as used device would drop to about 75%. Just updated the Hcigar VT75Nano, battery charge percentage in use fluctuates, it goes up, it goes down, you use it some it drops several percent then goes back up, then drops off,even at idle. Not going to bother with updates again, they f*ck an otherwise solid devices, not impressed grrrr
  7. Am having the same issue, collision detection on the buttons is way off, capture doesn't work full stop. Everywhere but says incorrect. Think I got the idea though
×
×
  • Create New...