Smeef

I've searched, but couldn't come up with any real answer. Is there any advantage to adding or reducing points within the battery discharge profile? More accuracy of the meter possibly? Just a thought that popped in my head today.

Just finished it up tonight. Alpinetech 1550 P+ Varitube 14mm 510 Powerhobby 1500 mah 45C lipo

So I got an email back from Evolv. Apparently back in August they made what they are calling the DNA200 V2 board. It's similar to the DNA250, minus some components that the 250 has.

It does not power at all on USB only.

Yes as soon as I hear something from them, I'll post it here.

I tried charging it on a 2A wall charger and it still only charged at 1A. I tried to input 166W in Escribe for max wattage at the kanthal power limit, but it still restricts the mod to 133W. I have it in 2S configuration. I re-opened my ticket and sent them an email to see what they say. EDIT.....When I tried changing the input amps, as soon as I click outside of the box, it reverts back to 24A

It doesn't make sense to me neither. When I sent my 200 in, I emailed them and asked them if it could be replaced with a 250. The gentleman told me that it was not possible. I opened the box today and was actually shocked they sent what I thought was a 250, until I hooked into Escribe.

And battery settings.

Here's the USB boxes ticked.

Also this is what I get when I retrieve the device information.

That's the only one I have of the front. It's in the mod now.

That is what I'm thinking yes. I sent them a 200 and got a box with a 200 label on it, but the picture I posted is what was inside. Everything in Escribe points to a 200, while looking at it points to a 250. I'm not quite sure what that person in that thread really had to do. I swapped out a Hobo X DNA200 with a 250 board and had to modify nothing. It could just be whatever mod he had, the makers had some type of screen mount that attached to the board itself which yes, there would be extra bits in that area. I'm not unhappy by any means. Just curious if this is a way for them to phase out the 200. Replace all old 200's with a 250 and leave it up to the end user with a firmware update.

I'm not really sure what you intend for me to gather from that thread. I read that earlier. You mentioned someone possibly mis-labeling a board so I posted a pic to show that it's more than just a mis-labeled board. The layout and components match that of a 250.

Possibly but it's laid out just like a 250 is.